Sunday, November 25, 2007

Ron Paul discussed on Daily Kos

Daily Kos has a post on Ron Paul supporters' Tea Party which could raise millions. Since it's a largely liberal site, the comments show how Paul has attracted many liberals too. Some examples below.

But first here's what the article has to say about the Ron Paul movement:
"Put the Paul campaign in a test tube and study it. There are lessons here for insurgent netroots campaigns at all levels (not just Presidential). A $10 million one day take (which is nearly a third of Obama and Hillary's total fundraising in a single quarter), is perhaps the most remarkable online feat ever engineered in campaign history."

Selected comments:
  • "I said it on that day and I'll say it again: Paul's stance on Iraq - immediate and unconditional withdrawal - earned him a $4m dollar day. But the Dems, the ones I give money to and who I vote for - still cannot manage to come with a coherent witdrawal policy."(link).

  • "If Paul wins the primary, we Dems are going to have a serious problem."(link)

  • "We Dems aren't energising the grassroots? Why? I don't know. We just don't have the coherent message that Paul does. Until a Dem does, we have a problem!"(link)

  • "The question is does a third party run jeopardize the Republicans more or the Democrats? He seems to pull about equal numbers of both."(link)

  • "I personally know six Democrats that have registered as Republican in order to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries. Paul is for real, and he's sucking the most activist Dems right out of the party! If Paul wins the primaries we Dems are going to be on the wrong end of a rout."(link)

  • "..because of the frontrunners' vulnerability on the war, and particularly that of the establishment's golden girl, they had to taunt, mock, humiliate and marginalize the antiwar Democratic candidates. They succeeded all too well, and the whole basket of grassroots politically unconnected antiwar energy was handed to Paul.."(link)

  • "..i keep running into people so dishearted with the Dems that they are considering voting for RP.."(link)

  • "..I'm hoping that Ron Paul is the GOP's worst nightmare; he is pulling a lot of libertarian's and disaffected republicans into his growing support. From what I hear there is growing support amongst traditionally liberal democrats who are sick and tired of being triangulated on things like civil liberties.."(link)

  • "..We Dems aren't getting it. THERE IS NO FORMULA. The thing that draws millions for Paul in a day is his message, not a damn formula strategized by marketers!.."(link)

  • "It's not a formula. It's honesty. It's adherence to principles that are clearly and consistently articulated. I'm an independent who has been, for all intents and purposes, a democrat and I am leaning heavily towards RP. I can say without hesitation that if RP wins the R and Hillary wins the D I'm voting with the former..."(link)
Now, take these statements with a pinch of salt. It could be faked to make it look like Paul has more support. On the Internet, nobody knows you are a dog.

Friday, November 23, 2007

Ron Paul supporters' Thanksgiving stories

This Thanksgiving, Ron Paul supporters are spreading the word. Here's 2 nice stories from the RP forum. One is how entire extended families are learning about him by word-of-mouth, the other is giving people at shopping lines some hot chocolate in RP-branded cups along with an RP slim-jim - till late at night and probably in the cold.

The first one should be read in its entirety, in the first person:
"A few weeks ago I appeared on the front page of the NY Times in the picture with Dr. Paul (was the guy in the R3volution sweatshirt above the poster he was signing). I told my dad about it (who wouldn't tell their parents?), and he asked me why I supported Dr. Paul. Now since I knew my father was a die-hard Christian, I told him the facts that would make him like Dr. Paul (married for 50 years, 18 grandchildren, pro-life, etc). This got him interested, but he never really talked to me after that day about him.

Today at my family's gathering (not just immediate family - cousins, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and even people I've never met before), I was sitting down with my grandmother talking to her about college. She asked what I've been doing in my spare time, so I asked her if she saw the NY Times front page image a few weeks back. She said no, but asked if I was on it. I told her I was, and that it was a picture with Ron Paul signing a poster. She perked up and said, and I quote, "He's a great man! I'm so glad your father told us about him. He has changed our opinion of politicians...read more"

You can find more pictures of the cups, hot chocolate being made as part of Operation Hot Chocolate drop.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Giving Ron Paul money - now or later?

The Ron Paul campaign put out a note to supporters asking that donations be sent sooner than later. The reason being that media ad slots have to be booked weeks in advance. Considering that the Tea Party is not till Dec 16th, they have no way to gauge how much Ron Paul effectively has in the bank.

This has stirred a fair amount of debate. Some feel that a whopping figure on the 16th and the ensuing publicity will make up for any ads that the campaign could not afford to run. Others feel it's presumptuous to think they know better than Paul's own staff about timing his expenditure. And just today I read about another money bomb being planned for Nov 30th to give the thermometer a quick boost.

Relevant forum threads:
- The 2 Steps 2 Victory! Nov. 30th and Dec. 16th!
- A tale of two (money) bombs

We have to wait and see how Nov 30th and Dec 16th play out. The movement quite resembles the distributed chaos of a free market, as Jason Rink perceptively noted.

There's a high degree of "ownership" among Ron Paul supporters towards his campaign. One person even commented that the grassroots has done a better job than the official staff itself when it comes to publicity and organization (not that Paul would mind that!).

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Ron Paul banners at Michigan-OSU football match

The OSU-Michigan football match on Nov 17 saw Ron Paul supporters turn out in large numbers. They used flying banners from 2 planes (one each from Michigan and Ohio) with the words "Univ of M is for Paul '08" and "OSU for Paul '08".
ESPN was covering this. In the post-match (or half-time?) analysis program, you can see a Ron Paul banner strategically placed between the 2 hosts discussing the game (Pic). Their aim of increasing Ron Paul's name recognition was well served I guess.

This video captures the Ron Paul supporters and the flying banners:


This is the Ron Paul forum thread where some of the planning happened.

Here's another video from an older Michigan football game, again with lots of Ron Paul supporters.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Ron Paul jokes

Some Ron Paul supporters are creating jokes about the candidate and on the supporters themselves.

Here's a selection of Ron Paul jokes (link):

- What's the difference between Abraham Lincoln and Ron Paul?
Abraham Lincoln has already been shot.

- What's Ron Paul's favorite form of exercise?
An evening Constitutional.

Ron Paul began thinking about the problems in America. First, he thought about our involvement in foreign wars and the loss of American lives overseas, and he cried a tear. Then, he thought about our loss of liberties at home, and he cried another tear. That's why he's called a second-tear candidate.

(This one is my favourite)
Q: How do you know you are in a room with a Ron Paul Supporter?
A: He'll tell you.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

(Ex-)Google engineer Vijay Boyapati's grand grassroots effort in New Hampshire for Ron Paul

[Update: Read my latest update on this project]

Operation Live Free or Die is the name of a volunteer effort launched in New Hampshire by Google engineer Vijay Boyapati who's quit his job to campaign for Ron Paul. He plans to get 1000 people to New Hampshire to do door-to-door canvassing. The counter on the site currently shows that 201 volunteers have signed up.

From their webpage:
"If we are able to gather a thousand dedicated supporters who can spend at least a week in New Hampshire before the primary we should be able to organize cavassing efforts in all the major cities of the State. I also propose that we hold three major rallies in the days before the primary."

The promo video for the effort:

Friday, November 16, 2007

USA Today full page ad for Ron Paul

Some supporters of Ron Paul are going to run a full page ad for him in USA Today coming Wednesday. Wikipedia says this newspaper is one of the largest circulated in the US.

Check out this forum post where the final draft of the ad was announced.


Thursday, November 15, 2007

A Video for America - another rocking Ron Paul anti-war video

It's a sign of the times that many Americans' creative and entrepreneurial spirit is being poured into political efforts. The war in Iraq takes centre-stage for many of them. Below is part 2 of an excellent montage called A Video for America. Notice how it reaches a crescendo.(Start watching from 3m:17s onwards if you are short of time)



I may not agree with all of its contents but it highlights again the grassroots nature of this campaign.

The final moments are from a Ron Paul speech in Congress(2007) titled The Neoconservative Empire.

A glimpse into an ideal world (according to Ron Paul)

Economists often use the "free market" as an ideal situation and analyze real world scenarios with respect to their deviations from the free market. The assumption is that one should always strive for a free market and justify every deviation from it on solid grounds.

Today Ron Paul has written an article titled Entangled Alliances, about the volatile political situation in Pakistan. Towards the end he briefly touches on how US' current approach deviates from his conception of the ideal situation:

"...Free trade means no sanctions against Iran, or Cuba or anyone else for that matter. Entangling alliances with no one means no foreign aid to Pakistan, or Egypt, or Israel, or anyone else for that matter. If an American citizen determines a foreign country or cause is worthy of their money, let them send it, and encourage their neighbors to send money too, but our government has no authority to use hard-earned American taxpayer dollars to mire us in these nightmarishly complicated, no-win entangling alliances..."

The key phrase is "Our government has no authority..". Paul generally uses it to mean something is unconstitutional. That means the government doesn't have the mandate to do it, irrespective of consequences.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Ron Paul's personality and political style win praise

Glenn Greenwald, political blogger at Salon first wrote about Ron Paul last week:

"..there is simply no denying certain attributes of Paul's campaign which are highly laudable. There have been few serious campaigns that are more substantive -- just purely focused on analyzing and solving the most vital political issues. There have been few candidates who more steadfastly avoid superficial gimmicks, cynical stunts, and manipulative tactics. There have been few candidates who espouse a more coherent, thoughtful, consistent ideology of politics, grounded in genuine convictions and crystal clear political values..."

Yesterday he rebutted someone's short sighted misinterpretation of Paul by quoting from his speech on the floor of the House. Though the issue itself is trivial, Paul's speech is worth reading in full:
"..First off, I think what we are trying to achieve through an amendment to the Constitution is to impose values on people – that is, teach people patriotism with our definition of what patriotism is. But we cannot force values on people; we cannot say there will be a law that a person will do such and such because it is disrespectful if they do not, and therefore, we are going to make sure that people have these values that we want to teach. Values in a free society are accepted voluntarily, not through coercion, and certainly not by law, because the law implies that there are guns, and that means the federal government and others will have to enforce these laws.."

In fact when I first heard of Paul sometime in May, I wrote:" ..his 15 minutes of fame will improve the quality of debate and put the focus on some core questions of the idea of US in an arena where personality and rhetoric rule."

Two top notch videos

Nov 5th has infused enormous confidence into supporters. They can't wait for The Tea Party on Dec 16th. The below 2 videos capture that spirit beautifully. Masterpieces I think. Watch with the volume turned up! :)



November 5th turned out a huge success

[Originally posted on Nov 8, 2007 at http://pramodbiligiri.livejournal.com/22978.html]

Just a note that the November 5th Ron Paul money bomb was a stupendous, outrageous success. The campaign received 4.2 million dollars in 24 hours, the biggest online one-day haul by far and one of the biggest 1 day raises ever. Everyone from FOX, CNN, NBC gave ample time to Ron Paul in their coverage: Examples.

Remember, the 5th of November

[Originally posted on Nov 3, 2007 at http://pramodbiligiri.livejournal.com/22700.html]

On November 5th (Monday), as many supporters of Ron Paul as possible will be donating to his campaign on the same day. The date was chosen because some threat to the British government was foiled on that day in 1605 (Wikipedia). In any case, it's supposed to showcase the organisational strength of the "netroots" so that the media will sit up and take notice. No one knows for sure how much money will be raised. I am expecting anything b/w 1 and 3 million. This could be the day to introduce Ron Paul if you have any friends in the US. Btw, they're calling it the "Ron Paul Money Bomb".

On Monday, keep an eye on the donation counter at Ron Paul 2008. I actually use the Ron Paul Donations Firefox extension that updates in a corner of the status bar every few minutes.

A girl called Liv has shot to fame by doing a few support videos for Ron Paul. She uses her good looks, considerable acting and scripting skills. Not to mention taking off a few clothes! The below video(NSFW) has been wildly successful.



You can find all her videos on LivFilms(NSFW).

Ron Paul grassroots - what all they are doing

[Originally posted on Oct 24, 2007 at http://pramodbiligiri.livejournal.com/22284.html]

Both the grassroots and the Ron Paul official campaign have seen some major events in the past week. First he announced a big rise in 3rd quarter donations: 5 million. It was also a clever ploy to raise visibility before the upcoming FOX News debate, where he again won the SMS poll easily. FOX gives highly unequal time to the candidates that it looks like they already want the frontrunners to win.

The donation info is updated real time on a nice looking Flash widget. It shows the name and location of donors as they give. Promptly someone grabbed the data off their URL and created Ron Paul Graphs. Its developer explained its significance saying: "this is the first time this level of transparency has ever been applied to the finances of a political campaign".

Another volunteer effort is Ron Paul Radio, a 24-hour Internet radio station which plays his speeches and songs about him, with some RJ-ing. The commentary is not top notch but the passion is. Speaking of songs, boy are they increasing too! I enjoyed some on the radio station the other day.

Others are creating all kinds of billboard signs in a competitive frenzy. Here's a video showing the making of a really large sign in Phoenix. 2 people on Digg are even more resourceful.

I doubt the Net was anywhere this powerful for Howard Dean in 2004. If you have any interest in the Web, media and/or politics, don't miss out on observing this unique movement. There is a certain innocence, glee and pride in the Ron Paul movement which is due to a rare confluence of politics, economics and technology. And things are just beginning to hot up!

Ron Paul interview on Online Newshour in PBS

[Originally posted on Oct 14, 2007 on http://pramodbiligiri.livejournal.com/21530.html]

Judy Woodruff conducts a smashing interview with Ron Paul on PBS. This is not your Hard Talk, in-your-face shoutfest, but gives the guest complete freedom and time to air his views. Obviously it assumes that viewers are intelligent, 'cos a stupid guest gets more than enough rope to hang himself.

Here's the transcript. And there's audio too.


Someone was saying that listening to Ron Paul is always an educative experience, whether or not you agree with him. It's no surprise that his post-debate rally in Michigan drew 2000 people.

Ron Paul rap song

[Originally posted on Sep 24, 2007 at http://pramodbiligiri.livejournal.com/20328.html]

Ron Paul continues to blaze the campaign trail. Propping him up is an inventive, audacious and Web-2.0 compliant grassroots movement. Latest exhibit is this (professional sounding) rap song. I never listen to rap but ended up rating it 5/5 on Youtube. How do you find this song?


Ron Paul@Google

[Originally posted on July 16, 2007 at http://pramodbiligiri.livejournal.com/17252.html]

Ron Paul talks at Google as part of their Candidates@Google program where they invite Presidential candidates for an interview. This is definitely one of the better interviews I've seen of Ron Paul. Again he stresses the role of free markets in bringing down prices of services/goods, saying how health care and education in the US are becoming progressively more expensive because the Govt. tries to regulate them. As a counter-example, prices of other goods like electronic items keep going down.



Some of the stronger statements from this talk (I'm paraphrasing):

  • It's perfectly all right for Google to do business in China. Anyone opposing should reject Google products but not use Govt. to arm twist the company

  • Govt. need not make safety, gun-control laws. In their absence, multiple private initiatives will exist to make things better. Eg: Consumer Reports

  • The Afghanistan war was more to do with oil and gas pipelines than Al Qaeda (He kind of hints at this)

  • The US dollar will continue to quickly lose value unless the Federal Reserve stops "printing money" and the currency is backed by "hard assets"

  • The environment will be better if there is more respect for private property (He thinks the threat of global warming is overblown)


It's held in a relaxed, leisurely setting. The interviewer doesn't interrupt the guest every 30 seconds or so.

And no ad breaks!

National morality

[Originally posted on June 06, 2007 at http://pramodbiligiri.livejournal.com/16143.html]

Ron Paul's run for the Republican Presidential nomination made me think about the strong human desire to give a moral underpinning to their worldview. When he quotes the Founding Fathers or the Constitution to find a high moral ground, it resonates with his audience. A world based on life, liberty and pursuit of happiness (LLH, in short) for everyone has idealistic allure. An attempt towards that seems the most natural thing to do.

Realpolitik shuns such aims and moves towards more earthy goals, probably because of practicality.

If you are willing to sacrifice the LLH of "others" in order to further your own, the moral underpinning is suddenly shaky. To avoid this kind of dilemma, the best compromise known till now is the concept of nationalism. A non-interventionist nation which minds its own business ignores moral persecution outside its borders. Thus resources are freed up to maximize the said values within its confines. Thomas Jefferson wrote: "Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto".

A moral worldview restricted to the nation has 2 distinct consequences:
1) It provides leeway for exploiting foreign countries
In particular, if the political and economic elite in those countries profess starkly different values (like in Africa, Middle East, China) it opens economic avenues which are impractical in the home country. Communism, dictators and genocide are brushed aside with much less ado. In fact, it's a foreign policy adage that "only interests matter" (not values).

2) It may fail to handle an increasingly interdependent ("globalized") world
Consider this criticism by Ron Paul: "Our foreign policy is designed to protect our oil interests".

But an isolationist State policy has an impact on access to scarce(?) natural resources like oil, minerals. The country's demand will have to be met through purely commercial transactions. Other countries which use State clout to further business demands might fare better.

Global warming is another problem which straddles national boundaries. Our political, economic structures are not suited to tackle this unless we innovate. International co-operation is required on a massive scale. It remains to be seen if transnational commercial incentives will work.

There is only a thin line between a country "minding its own business" and attacking others to secure this business.

Ron Paul keeps questioning the role of Government

[Originally posted on May 17, 2007 at http://pramodbiligiri.livejournal.com/16087.html]

It was only last week that I first heard of Ron Paul, from a video linked on Reddit. (He's a long time Congressman from Texas who is contesting to be elected as the Republican candidate for Presidentship. His visibility shot up a few days back due to a 9/11-related spat with fellow contestant and ex N.Y. mayor Rudi Giuliani in a debate with other Republican candidates on Fox News. An immediate poll gave him the top rating among the debaters, though it's possible that the poll was spammed by avid supporters.)

As I watched that hour long speech, I kept on getting surprised by his skill in presenting a classical liberal, libertarian critique of the current Conservative control of US government. He draws with a casual, scholarly flair from American history, Constitution, economics, foreign policy and plain common sense. His voting record in Congress has been highly consistent with his ideals.

Answering questions in a talk show (05m:51s)

Much of his ideas are derived from first principles of Libertarianism and classical liberalism (he even won from the Libertarian Party ticket once!), so a few quotes will convey the gist of his positions:

"The government should be out of regulating the economy."
"Working Americans like lower taxes. So do I."
"The war in Iraq was sold to us with false information. The area is more dangerous now than when we entered it."
"The biggest threat to your privacy is the government."

I doubt Ron Paul will win either the Republican nomination or the Presidentship in case he wins the first (I hope I'm proved wrong). His opinions are too radical for either big business or the poor to see any immediate benefit. Moreover, his thoughtful, fact-filled presentations could be overrun by someone more charming and folksy like Bush. He has little backing even within the Republican party. That is a bad sign when running for a job in which one should carry the whole country along!

Ron Paul is best suited for heading committees and framing policy, which he has always been doing. Still, his 15 minutes of fame will improve the quality of debate and put the focus on some core questions of the idea of US in an arena where personality and rhetoric rule.